tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27644679.post7297004825223309433..comments2023-11-03T03:17:27.053-05:00Comments on NPR Check: Non-journalism Meets Non-scienceMytwordshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04307620268159811668noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27644679.post-23364303892192913882010-02-03T13:52:53.072-06:002010-02-03T13:52:53.072-06:00Bingo -- your thoughts mirror the frustration I...Bingo -- your thoughts mirror the frustration I've had with NPR not only in their science coverage, but political coverage as well. The need to maintain equivalence (qualitative & quantitative) between neo-con and liberal positions -- whether we're talking flip/flop politics, dirty-tricks, terrorism, you-name-it -- has been astounding! This pursuit of enforced objectivity at the expense of critical, hard nosed, factual (or at least, value-impact) analysis -- that draws no conclusions -- masks the reality NPR purportedly reports on.Rande Neukamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12164369722680725061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27644679.post-44443309627802921552007-05-30T22:35:00.000-05:002007-05-30T22:35:00.000-05:00Haggerty is a known tool. She's been doing faith=...Haggerty is a known tool. She's been doing faith=based reporting for a long time. NPR has gone to her before in the Dover, PA creation science mess, in defference to either Nina Totenberg, the legal correspondant, or to any scientist whatsoever. As far as I can tell, Haggerty is an expert on absolutely nothing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com